The Anti-Science President

Remember the scene from the movie “Titanic”? The ship has hit the iceberg and taking-in water rapidly.

Rose: Don’t you understand? The water is freezing and there aren’t enough boats. Not enough by half. Half the people on this ship are gonna die.

Cal: Not the better half.

Now re-imagine the scene such that the iceberg is Climate Change, and the sinking ship is planet Earth, the crash event has already occurred. Are you one of those who are going to sink/die? Or do you, by an extraordinary turn of luck, find yourself in the “better half” category, thinking you would be able to save yourself, by paying for your passage on a “lifeboat”?

With climate fires raging on one side of the country, climate hurricanes and climate floods on another, while we are in a midst of a pandemic that’s killed more than 200,000 Americans alone, surely your certainty must be a little bit shaken, no matter who you are or how you vote? If you are still wondering, look out — perhaps from your window, or at photos and videos, of the wildfires on the west coast, burning trailer parks and mansions alike, choking the lungs of the homeless as well as the billionaires. Climate Change is the iceberg that none of us are going to survive, at most it will buy the rich a few extra years on a dying planet. Whether we like it or not, we have finally arrived at a time in history when our fates are inter-twined, no matter where or how we live. The only way to survive this impending disaster is for us to start walking on a path of compassion, perseverance and self-sacrifice, guided by science. For nations around the world to act in such a manner, we need to elect leaders who inspire such qualities. It’s a no brainer then that “45” must go.

Donald Trump is the most anti-science and anti-environment president America has ever seen. Let us consider some of the other men who have occupied the highest office of the land in the last 100 years or so. After becoming president in 1901, Teddy Roosevelt; a Republican, established 150 national forests, 51 federal bird reserves, 4 national game preserves, 5 national parks and 18 national monuments. FDR; a Democrat, created the Civilian Conservation Corps putting unemployed men to work on conservation projects — fighting soil erosion, planting trees and improving wild life habitats, he added over one-quarter of the areas in today’s National Park Service system. Nixon; a Republican, championed path-breaking environmental protections for Americans, by creating the EPA, and signing the Clean Air Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act. Carter; a Democrat, supported legislation for the cleanup of toxic contamination and protected swaths of land in Alaska, he also had the courage to exhort Americans to rein in their consumption of gasoline and electricity. Bill Clinton placed millions of acres of federal land off-limits to development as national monuments, surpassing the acreage that Roosevelt had set aside. It was no small feat of leadership when President Obama; despite the hostility of Republicans in Congress, managed to corral every single country on the planet into the Paris Climate Agreement, in a last ditch effort to save humanity from imminent disaster. Fast forward 1.5 years later, President Trump who had alternately called Climate Change “a hoax”, “not a hoax”, “a hoax invented by China” and a “very serious subject” promised to withdraw America from the Paris Climate Agreement. That marked the beginning of his legacy as the President with the worst environmental record ever.

Pursuing an unrelenting fossil fuel agenda, Trump placed former industry executives and lobbyists in control of the EPA, who promptly scaled back or eliminated over 150 environment measures for the sole benefit of the fossil fuel industry. His administration rolled back auto emission standards, rejected regulations on airborne emissions of mercury; a potent neurotoxin & other toxic substances from power plants, and reduced regulation on the disposal and storage of coal ash. It opened up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, national monuments in Utah and coastal waters all around the United States to drilling. It weakened rules that limited venting or flaring of methane from oil and gas production on public lands. Just as the nonpartisan auditing agency; Government Accountability Office (GAO) was issuing the Climate Change warning that natural disasters had cost America $350bn in the previous decade alone, Trump administration was quietly removing “Climate Change” references from government websites. While the country was reeling from the effects of climate hurricanes Harvey and Maria, his administration relieved federal agencies from having to consider a project’s impact on Climate Change during the review and permitting process. While our attention span has been consumed by the President’s ridiculous tweets, his administration has been steadily and ominously working behind the scenes to further its all-out assault on the environment.

Every attempt to discuss environmental issues is overshadowed by disingenuous arguments claiming its adverse effects on “job”, “economy”, “business friendly environment”, “burdensome regulations” etc. This is simply lying propaganda. Most of Trump’s regulatory rollbacks are intended to boost fossil fuel production and use, to line the pockets of the fossil fuel industry because it donates millions of dollars to the election campaigns of those who champion them. What else would explain the burying of a proposal to improve the connection between the east and west coast electricity grids, which would have meant more jobs, cheaper electricity, greater resilience and less pollution, but also death to the least efficient means of power generation aka coal? It was not buried to benefit small businesses or the lives of ordinary Americans. The lives of ordinary Americans would greatly benefit from not having to breathe air laden with toxic pollutants or drink water laced with lead. The lives of ordinary Americans would vastly improve from the millions of new and well-paying jobs that the Green Deal offers. The lives of coalminers dying from black lung would vastly improve if employed in clean green jobs such as making wind turbines, right where they live. The lives of Texans, Puerto Ricans and Louisianans would be infinitely better if their homes were not flooded and towns not devastated by hurricanes growing ever more powerful due to warming oceans. Same goes for the lives of Californians, Oregonians and Washingtonians, which are increasingly impacted by wildfires, intensifying each year due to long periods of drought.

Whatever else Americans may think of the President, there is not much doubt that he is not the brightest when it comes to Science — looking at a solar eclipse with naked eyes, suggesting Americans inject bleach or take Hydroxychloroquine to fight COVID-19, ignoring the advice of his own scientists and doctors. Why then should Americans trust him with a challenge as complex as Climate Change? Imagine your cardiologist told you that you were going to have a heart-attack, unless you hit the gym, cut back on meat, and got your act together. Would you keep doctor-shopping until you found one who told you that your diseases will just “miraculously disappear”? What if 98/100 doctors you consulted, told you that your prognosis was bad? That’s the terrifying prognosis of Climate Change. His mindboggling anti-science stance is precisely the reason why hallowed American institutions and publications such as Scientific American and The New England Journal of Medicine have for the first time in their 175 and 208 year history respectively, decided to publicly warn Americans about the dangers of re-electing this President.

Whether its sea level rise, extreme weather events, water scarcity, food shortages, mass extinction of species, humanity’s very existence is under attack.Yet, this President has chosen the path of extreme apathy, willful ignorance and deceitful talking points, instead of preparing us for this unprecedented disaster looming at our doorstep. Just like pandemic scientists had been warning us for years about the possibility of a deadly disease like COVID-19 striking the world, climate scientists have been sounding similar alarms with far more terrible consequences. Do we really want to be caught as ill-equipped by the worst effects of Climate Change as we were by the pandemic? Unlike the pandemic, Climate Change won’t be solved by a single vaccine. Its death rate won’t be as low as 1% either. And unlike the President if/when we find ourselves sick or homeless, we won’t have the luxury to be air-lifted by Air Force One, out of the mess we ourselves created.

If there is any good news on Climate Change, it is that we have the tools to slow it down and mitigate its worst effects; all we need is the will — political, individual and collective. Like tropical storms that turn into hurricanes, and outbreaks that turn into pandemics, the marvel of today’s scientific knowledge is that it gives us time and ability to forecast and plan ahead. That science is telling us that we don’t have much time left, it is telling us the steps we need to take NOW or countless lives would be lost. By refusing to look at the science, Trump is waging a war on Americans themselves, abrogating his single most important duty as commander-in-chief. On November 4th, the United States would officially pull out of the Paris Agreement, ending any real hope for the environment, the world and our very own future. On November 3rd, the eyes of the world would be upon us — watching to see if America is still the country that won wars and dared to stand on the right side of history, or if we have devolved into a clueless careless lot, that would happily re-elect the enemy of the people himself.

If we do, we might as well kiss our children good night, the water is going to be cold.

Swati Srivastava is a film-maker, an environmentalist and a first generation immigrant to the United States. She can be reached via Linkedin and swati@TiredAndBeatup.com

Originally published at https://indiawest.com on October 16, 2020.

Aren’t You Breaking the Oath of Allegiance?

A hyphenated identity doesn’t mean we always get to play on both teams.

As an Indian American, it is hard to escape the cacophony of diatribe for and against four more years of President Trump. Indian-Americans have traditionally affiliated themselves with Democrats but today their loyalties are split; two seminal events — the election of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2014 and of Trump in 2016, along with the perceived friendship between Trump and Modi has drawn a wedge in the community, with both sides claiming an urgent moral right.

The opponents of Trump see his continued presidency as a threat to diversity and empowering white nationalism, continued governmental incompetence as COVID-19 wrecks havoc on lives and economy, and a level of corruption that is perceived to be an existential threat to American democracy itself. The supporters of Trump on the other hand, see his presidency as upholding a “law & order,” good for their pocketbooks and the economy, and continued unquestioned support for the Modi government policies in India. There is also a sense in the support group that Trump is better for the Indian economy and that India will enjoy a more special relationship with the U.S. under another Trump presidency. Upon closer examination, however, this turns out to be flawed thinking.

As Indian-Americans we live a hyphenated identity that tugs on our hearts in two directions. So, it’s important to learn the facts about which candidate is truly a friend of India. President Trump has proved time and again that he is nobody’s friend; his administration revoked India’s special trade partner status, levied tariffs on Indian imports, cut visas to Indian immigrants, left many Indians in immigration limbo, produced zero trade deals, blamed India’s greed for America’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, falsely claimed that Prime Minister Modi asked Trump to intervene in Kashmir as well as mediate dispute with China, the list goes on.

On the other hand, it was the Obama-Biden administration that granted India a major defense partner status, signed trade deals with India worth up to $500 billion, improved immigration policies for Indians and Indian Americans, endorsed India to have a permanent seat on the United Nations’ Security Council, supported India against China’s growing influence, and encouraged and executed Paris Climate Agreement with India etc. Biden famously called the U.S.-India relationship “a defining partnership of the 21st century” and as per Richard Verma, the former US.. ambassador to India, there would have been no U.S.-India civil nuclear deal but for Joe Biden. Now, Biden’s campaign has made history by nominating the first Indian-American candidate for Vice President proving that the Democratic Party truly values diversity. The only thing that governs Trump is his own political expediency whereas Biden has a vision that extends far beyond his own nose.

Yet there is a deeper issue that’s lurking behind this debate that we must confront. Of all the topics being passionately discussed in Indian American homes all across America — healthcare & COVID-19, jobs and economy, climate change etc. — one that stands out for me is “Voting for Trump is Voting for India”, a line frequently quoted on social media among Indian-American Trump supporters along with the sentiment “for Hindus, what matters is the candidate supported by NaMo” (NaMo being short for Narendra Modi). For the record, Narendra Modi himself has not endorsed either candidate, but the quote seems to be in circulation and merits a closer look.

If, as an Indian American you find yourself thinking along similar lines, you are likely someone who grew up in India and became a naturalized citizen of America. I want you to pause for a moment and ask yourself, whose President are you voting for? Every Indian American who acquired U.S. citizenship through naturalization took the oath to absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign state, and to defend the constitution and laws of the United States. Thus, the most crucial question we should be asking ourselves in this election is whether the President we support and vote for is someone who respects and defends the very constitution and laws that we ourselves vowed to.

Insight into Another Political System

As Indian Americans we have an insight into the strengths and failings of another political system. If I ask you to name some of the failings of Indian politics, you might start with political dynasty and nepotism. Trump’s administration has had more family appointees than any other U.S. president in history — most famously his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner whose only qualification for the positions they hold in the Executive branch is their relationship to the President. Family relationship has become the new currency in a Trump administration extending to sons and daughters of Trump’s associates such as Rudy Giuliani, girlfriends of Trump’s sons are given cushy positions, and half of RNC’s key speakers were Trump family members.

Another facet of Indian politics that we share disdain for is Indian politicians lining their own pockets. Trump refused to separate himself from his business interests, proposing international conferences to be held at his resort properties, which get free advertising on top of the revenue from lodging his guards and the retinue. Both Eric and Donald Trump Jr. have continued to conduct business on behalf of The Trump Organization and openly benefit from their father’s position; Ivanka Trump snagged a valuable set of Chinese trademarks on the same day she dined with the Chinese president, Kushner family pushed visas to wealthy Chinese who invested in their properties. The revolving door between government and business has never been swung so wide and so blatantly. We have all come to accept a certain level of corruption in the halls of Congress and politics in general but a new nadir has been reached under this President.

Another major failing of Indian politics is the politicians’ general attitude of being above the law; their outright illegalities and incessant lying. There has been no American president, at least in the modern era, who has considered himself to be above the law quite like Donald Trump. This is the President who refused to follow the good-faith tradition set by his predecessors since 1974, Republican and Democrat alike, refusing to disclose his tax returns, even waging a legal battle to keep them hidden — we know now it was an attempt to hide the extent to which his businesses were losing money, further diminishing his sole claim to competency as a savvy & profitable business-man, on the contrary he appears to be an inept businessman and a serial tax avoider crushed by massive debts that put him in potential and often direct conflict of interest with his job as president. This is the President who has been involved in 4,000 lawsuits in his professional career — many of which he openly gloated to be a form of coercion against the less powerful simply as a bullying tactic. He also has at least 126 multi-state lawsuits filed against him since becoming President.

There is an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to lawsuits against Trump — sexual misconduct, financial manipulation, employee payment, charity fraud, you name it. This is the President who has been accused by not one, not two but 26 women of sexual misconduct; some of those allegations include rape. This is the President who lies so much that his entire campaign and presidency is propped up on disinformation — by July 9th 2020 the fact checker database keeping the score registered 20,000 lies. This is the President whose key advisors, aides, donors and campaign staff have admitted to crimes, some have even been convicted by a court of law only to have been pardoned by the President himself in a direct contradiction to his claim as a “law and order President.”

Another aspect of Indian politics that many Indian Americans find regressive is the creation and fueling of minority voting blocs called “vote banks.” If we stand against the narrow-minded self-interest perpetuated by voting blocs and the corrupt favoritism such process entails, then we should not ask what the candidates from either party in America can do for “our minority bloc,” rather we should focus on what we can do for America as our adopted country.

Immigrants in an Adopted Land

Many of us left our country of birth and came to America in search of “better opportunity,” is it possible we might have found better opportunity in India itself, if its political system was not rife with greed, corruption, nepotism, being “above the law” and vote banks? How can we turn our face away from the uncomfortable parallels the Trump administration has with the corruption we encountered and suffered in India? How does this President’s sense of legal impunity not offend our sense of right, our sense of law and order? How can the brazen nepotism and corruption rife in the Trump administration not affect our support for him? Four more years of this presidency risks dragging the American political system down to a level par with some of the most corrupt countries in the world, with immense ramifications. What will happen to this “land of opportunity” then?

We are at a time of great upheaval around the world and especially in America. COVID-19 has laid bare the incompetence of Trump’s administration and brought America to its knees. No matter what claim Trump makes, the numbers don’t lie. This is the President under which America is facing the worst economy since the Great Depression and the worst civil strife since the 1960s. This is the President, who on a daily basis, sows hate about minority groups, peddles lies about the greatest pandemic the world has seen in a century, refuses to wear a mask & holds rallies undermining the hard work state governors are doing to keep their people safe, and “takes no responsibility at all” for the mayhem and for the lives lost. Eisenhower famously had a sign on his desk “the buck stops here”, but not this President; he would do anything to shirk responsibility.

This is the President who undermines science and scientists every day, whether it comes to dealing with the Pandemic or dealing with climate chaos without any regard to the havoc and destruction his actions and inactions wreck on real lives. We must open our eyes and see for ourselves that the America we love is currently leading the world in all the wrong ways. Some are calling it the end of the American era , that’s shameful and heartbreaking, a situation that must be fought and reversed by all we hold dear. A Biden presidency cannot possibly solve all our problems. But another 4 years under the leadership of a man who is unable to take responsibility, listen to scientists, or lead by love will simply dig the hole deeper.

As Indian-Americans we have the good fortune to be one of the “model minorities.” But we must not forget how we got here. It was the liberalism of America that gave us the very seat at the table upon which we have made our perch. Liberalism of Lyndon Johnson is what passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 that paved the path for a new generation of Indians arriving in America — who despite the color of their skin were not relegated to separate schools, lunch counters or restrooms — a fight won by the blood, sweat and tears of African Americans, a fight that Kamala Harris’s Indian mother participated in and that we should proudly own.

In the ensuing years, both Republican and Democrat presidents supported immigration, the H-1B visa was started under George H.W. Bush and enhanced by Bill Clinton ushering in the second wave of Indians to this country. Bush Jr. was famously pro- immigrant. But under Trump the Republican party has morphed, no longer immigrant friendly. Trump’s rhetoric fans the flames of white nationalism instead. Trump’s party is the only major political party in the world today that stands on the wrong side of the war against climate change; the apocalypse that comes exponentially closer every year we don’t act — and won’t act under another Trump Presidency. If you must consider India in your vote for the U.S. President, then consider that Trump’s policy on climate change threatens the very habitability of India and ultimately its existence.

The uniqueness of America is that it allows and fosters a hyphenated identity. Yet there are limits to this allowance. We are all aware of the awful decision to move Japanese-Americans to internment camps during World War II because their loyalty to their adopted country was under doubt. If “voting for Trump is voting for India” — aren’t you breaking the oath of allegiance, willfully distorting a domestic election for the benefit of a foreign power? If you are going to indulge in what could be construed as potentially treacherous or at minimum disloyal behavior, how will you defend against the white nationalist viewpoint that is already unfurling signs calling “Diversity = White Genocide” with impunity under a President who calls them “very fine people”?

Jews were the educated and affluent minority — some would say “model minority” in many parts of Europe before the nationalists came to power in Germany in the 1930s. Those “model minority” traits made them the enemy of the nationalists who found them an easy target for their hate and resentment. Many Jews living in the 1930s tried hard to “work with” the rising tide of nationalism around them, the problem with the monster of nationalism is that once unleashed eventually devours everything in its path. To support President Trump and his fostering of white nationalism without stopping to consider its potential outcome for minorities including us is naïve thinking at best.

A hyphenated identity doesn’t mean we always get to play on both teams; sometimes we must pick a side. This election is one of those times. If you are asking the question which candidate is better for India, you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be asking is which candidate is better for America, and hope that it aligns with Indian interests. If you simply cannot separate Indian politics from American politics, if Indian politics is all that matters to you, you might as well go back to where you came from and vote there.

Swati Srivastava is a film-maker, an environmentalist and a first generation immigrant to the United States. She can be reached via Linkedin and swati@TiredAndBeatup.com

Originally published at https://americankahani.com on September 28, 2020.

I can’t turn the page

I open my digital diary to write my thoughts in
It takes a long time to load, reminding me it’s time to begin
a new word document; like I used to do before, when she was still around
every now and then, I would conclude an old doc and a new doc would be found..!

I would call it “turning the page”.

But now I can’t bring myself to turn anything
as if my heart refuses to have a new beginning
I write wrapped in the security of the old document
The file hangs; it’s too big, I face a predicament

It pleads I close this chapter and begin again, afresh, anew and such
I balk. I will carry on living in the same sentence, thank you very much
I fear a comma maybe safe, a semi-colon may do, but a full stop – that’s dangerous!
Carrying in it the threat of a new sentence, a new paragraph, a new page – and that’s serious!

A new page takes me further
and farther away from her
So. I can’t turn the page.

Writing in the document that began when she was still near
feels like living in the same house, the same city, at least the same hemisphere
As her.
I imagine us living on Broadway, both of us
She uptown, I downtown, I could take the train or the bus
And even if no train or bus would take me to her place,
there is at least a straight, known path to her space
I would walk
And if no walk could cover such distance,
To take me to the meaning of my existence
I can still believe our new addresses share the same street name
Starting a new page, a new doc would be so lame
It would be like turning a corner or moving on, to another street
then another, and soon, any odds of running into her would be beat.

The doc hangs again, I cross my fingers
The hourglass lingers
But No. I can’t turn the page.

Swati is a sister, storyteller, a filmmaker, an environmentalist and a first generation immigrant to the United States. She can be reached via Linkedin and swati@TiredAndBeatup.com

I sit down to write

I sit down to write.
Never really sure if I weave a story
or if it’s the story that weaves me

It is creative some days
but agonizing in many ways
Some agonies just agonies of the art
but others are peculiar to my heart.

They say good stories come
from heart’s deepest recesses
whence battles have scratched, gnawed, wrung,
left scars & abscesses

It’s a torment to remember the pain
I flinch my heart would bleed again.
But should forgetting become my aim
I dread if I would forget my name.

I go on striving to equalize
my doings, my writings, my being.
And neglect what was once surmised
“On love, on grief, on every human thing,
Time sprinkles Lethe’s* water with his wing.”

I sit down to write.

Lethe*- In Classical Greek, Lethe literally means “forgetfulness” or “concealment” .
River Lethe is the one that souls on their way to heaven / purgatory drink from to forget their lives.
On love, on grief, on every human thing,
Time sprinkles Lethe’s water with his wing. ” – Walter Savage Landor.

Glacier

When she died,
I thought I had an ocean in my eyes
an ocean that would never dry up
no matter how many salty tears it cries.

Years passed.
The wound sealed.
Somehow I lived.
My innards steeled.

Yesterday I cried again
the ocean in my eyes spilled
the taste of tears on my lips
not salty but chilled.

Maybe my eyes
have cried out their ocean
Rather what I tasted
was steely ice in motion.

Maybe it is in the normal order of things,
to turn from ocean into glacier.

The Story of Shambhu

“Mere desh ki dharti sona ugle, ugle hire moti, mere desh ki dharti”
(“The soil of my country produces gold, produces diamonds and pearls, this soil of my land”)[1]

I remember watching the song from the film “Upkaar” by Manoj Kumar on TV when I was a child, growing up in India in the 80s.  The hard-working farmer-hero carrying a plough through the fields sings a song that praises the soil of his country – India. All around him, the idyllic life of the village goes on. The movie repeated so many times on TV that we came to know the song by heart. There were two channels on TV in those days – Doordarshan 1 and Doordarshan 2. There was one movie of the week aired on Sunday evenings. I know I must sound ancient to the ears of the youngsters who are growing up in the world of satellite TV, cable TV, continuous access to movie re-runs, 24 hour shows, Youtube, Internet and all the bells and whistles of the modern age of entertainment.
But, my generation grew up on ONE movie aired every Sunday. I loved watching movies. Movies left a deep impact on me. Movies such as Do Bigha Zameen, Saheb bibi gulam, Pyaasa, Guide, Jis desh main ganga behti hai, Mother India, Dharam Putra, Upkaar, Kranti, Aradhana, Gandhi, Akhir Kyo, Arth, Meri Jung, Lamhe and more recently Lagaan, Rang De Basanti, Tarein Zamein par, 3 idiots to name a few. Movies that entertained but also taught invaluable lessons. It was from exceptional movies such as these I learnt what price we paid for our freedom, the value of perseverance, women’s struggle for identity, the meaning of brotherhood, the value of treading on earth gently and tolerance for people who are different than us on surface. Movies taught me to appreciate the beauty of the country we call “Bhaarat- Maa”.

It wasn’t until many years later when I became a film-maker myself and having learnt about cinema from all over the world such as American, Italian, French, Japanese, Spanish etc, I turned to Indian cinema once more, but this time I found something amiss. Yes, there were more and more movies being made and more and more channels to see them on, but I found less and less pleasure in this new found abundance. There were movies galore but most of them mindless, meaningless chatter. It was like munching on fast food constantly but it had no real nutrition for the body or the soul.  What had happened?

At about the same time as I started asking these questions, I came across a report which said “Every Thirty Minutes – An Indian Farmer Commits suicide”. I was stunned. Every 30 Minutes? An Indian farmer? Commits Suicide? Why?

Various images conjured up in my mind. Like any other naïve city bred person, I had a perfect picture of a farmer’s life.  One principled farmer (Shambhu[2]), with a shy but hard-working wife (Parvati),  two children – one boy, one girl, old wise parents, all living on a small plot of land on which they grow food. Food that feeds them as well as feeds India. Shambhu has a pair of bulls that he lovingly calls Raam and Shyaam. The family has a cow named Gaura that gives them plenty of milk for the family and cow dung that Shambhu uses as fertilizer. Shambhu’s life is a hard one for sure but he takes pleasure from this work. This is “his craft”, his family has been doing it for generations. And even though there are occasional ups and downs, especially when the monsoon doesn’t arrive on time, in the end the farmer receives the boon and his perseverance pays off. All is well.

But no where in this rosy picture did I have space for Shambhu to give up and take his own life? That simply can’t be.

I started reading and doing research about what the Center for Human rights & Global Justice, NY School of Law, calls the “Largest wave of recorded Suicides in Human history”[3].  I read about the price the farmers are paying for a more globalized, more modern India. In today’s India, the cost of inputs for a farmer (seeds, fertilizer, pesticide, herbicide) are controlled by multi-national corporations whose single motive is profit for their shareholders.  At the same time, with the collapse of price supports from the government, the revenue that the farmer gets is dependent upon the increasingly volatile world food/ commodity index.

Let me explain in lay-women’s terms : Imagine Shambhu at the beginning of the planting season 50 years ago. His cost for seeds is negligible; after all, like his other brethrens, he saves his seeds from season to season. So, he pays nothing for the seed. He has the world’s greatest fertilizer in the form of cow dung. The earth is rich and fertile and if he has to use pesticide, it is mostly made out of natural products. His main cost is labor especially during sowing and harvesting teams. But as a farmer, that does not bother him, he signed up for manual labor. His main worry is monsoon because monsoon is fickle. If he has good monsoon, he will have a plentiful  harvest and he will be able to sell it at a decent price. Even if the good harvest causes a sudden surge in the supply of a grain, the government will step in with minimum price supports so that the price of his grain doesn’t fall too far low. If the monsoon fails, he might have a poor harvest. But the government will again step in to provide him some support and if not, the saving from the good years will tide him through the bad ones.

Fast forward 50 years later. Shambhu is told through advertisements and government sponsored programs that he doesn’t bother with saving seeds any more because there are miracle seeds on the market. They are Genetically Modified to create their own pesticide so that each plant cell creates its own poison (yes you read that right..!) so that when pests eat the plant, they drop dead. Indeed, it is being sold as the best thing that could happen to agriculture…! Now, Shambhu is not very literate and he believes what the Government tells him, and pests in his field are a perpetual problem. Removing them is a back-breaking labor intensive exercise. What’s the harm in using the seed that will kill the pests on its own? It does sound miraculous. Of course, there is a catch. This miracle seed comes at a price. Indeed, not just a price. It comes at three times the price, sometimes up to 10 times the price of the non-GM variety[4]. So, Shambhu is skeptical. How will he afford this? But then there is another lure. Besides, the fact that this new seed doesn’t need any pesticide, it also promises to give many times the yield of a regular seed. Of course, it must be planted and raised in the EXACT manner as per the instructions on the seed packet. Shambhu is sold on the idea. The farmer becomes the automaton.

Now, there is the last problem of arranging the money for buying these expensive seeds and all the other inputs it requires – Chemical Fertilizers, Herbicide, and Pesticides. Pesticides you say? We thought the whole point of the GM seed was that it didn’t need pesticides coz it created its own and killed the pests. Yes, yes, but read the fine print. It only kills ONE kind of pest. Do you know how many kinds of pests there are in the field? Tens, even hundreds of pests. So, you need to buy pesticide as well.

Since the government itself is propagating the miracle seed, the bank happily gives loan to Shambhu. Shambhu takes God’s name and plants the miracle seeds. All he has to do is to follow the instructions and he will have a wonderful harvest. With the extra money, he will pay the loan and buy even more seeds and then, the year after, he will be able to buy that new tractor he has dreamed of all his life. Or perhaps send his children to a better school. Or just buy a new Sari for his lovely wife. He dreams…!

There is one problem with this wonderful dream. Shambhu is a cotton farmer in Vidarbha, a particularly drought prone area. There is the single most important instruction on the seed packet, something to the effect of “Plant in irrigated land only”. 65% of India’s cotton farms are rain-fed, without any re-course to irrigation. But, Shambhu doesn’t know that. The instructions on the seed packet are in English. Somehow, the Indian government fails to mention this in their rush to promote GM seeds.

His crops suffer, the yield turns out to be even less than the yield he was used to from his previous seeds. Shambhu is in panic. He is neck deep in loan and he has very little crop to sell. His only hope is some sort of Minimum Support Price (MSP) from government when harvest time comes. But when it is time to sell the harvest, he finds that the price of his crop is no more set by his Government. Instead, it is set by some food exchange somewhere in a place called Chicago where food is a commodity and Economics is God. He also hears that in other rich countries, when the price of food drops below a certain level, their government steps in to support its farmers through subsidies and MSP. But in India, the Government has checked out.

So, Shambhu is a stuck in a new world order. Here, the inputs for his farm are controlled by multi-national conglomerates whose only interest is their bottom-line profit and the output price is set by some alien stock market like exchange system which has no time to concern itself with  little problems of little farmers like Shambhu.  Welcome, Shambhu, the system is ready to chew you.

While Shambhu is saddled with debts and a bad harvest, a new planting season arrives. Shambhu returns to the bank but now that he is in default of the loan from last year, the bank doesn’t consider him credit worthy and declines his loan application. Instead, it threatens him jail-time, if he doesn’t pay his loan soon. Shambhu has no recourse but to turn to a private money lender, Sukhi Lala[5], a loan shark who willingly provides him loan at usurious interest rates. Sukhi Lala tells Shambhu that he is only doing it as a favor to Shambhu and that he better make sure he pays back with full interest next year. Sukhi Lala reminds him that Shambhu’s only asset is his 2 acres of land and Sukhi Lala will hate to see him lose it. You get my point.

The cost of inputs has gone up this year – inflation. Shambhu can’t replant any of the GM seeds because they are hybrids and can only be used once. And even if he could, he better not re-plant them or he can soon find himself in a patent infringement case (More about this in another blog. Such cases are quite the norm in America. For the brave-hearted and genuinely interested, read Monsanto vs. US Farmers, Center For Food Safety[6])
The cycle continues – another year of costly seeds, expensive fertilizer, exorbitant pesticides. And little  rain. Another poor harvest. Chicago Commodity Exchange, Lack of Minimum Support Price. Desperation.

Sukhi Lala tells Shambhu that his land will be confiscated since he hasn’t been able to repay the loan. Shambhu is devastated. He is penniless, his crop is lost, his nameless pair of bulls and his one cow are all but emaciated. Nameless bulls and cow, you ask? Aren’t they called Raam, Shyaam and Gaura? No, silly. That was 50 years ago. In the new India, Shambhu doesn’t name his livestock. Naming an animal makes the relationship with it more personal and he can’t afford to get attached to an animal that he may need to sell anytime to feed his family. Indeed, one day Shambhu is not vigilant and one of his bulls grazes on the leaves of GM Cotton, and dies within a few days[7]. He has no money to buy another bull or buy feed for his remaining livestock. His family is going hungry and the land that has been in his family for generations is going to be sold on his watch. He sees himself as a failure. He doesn’t understand that the system has no more use for him and so it has spit him out. The only thing left for him to do is open the expensive bottle of pesticide and gulp it down his throat. The pain is extreme, and it lasts for a few hours. But then, its quiet and he is finally at rest. Until of course, the police seize his body for Autopsy. You have already seen the state of the Autopsy Center where his body is taken [8]. What happens to his body during Autopsy, is better left unsaid; we can imagine enough from this video. But the state of the Autopsy Lab is just a symptom of a much larger disease; a system that has been designed, whether purposefully or not, to give the exact results that it’s delivering.

Over the past few years, there has been quite a bit of hue and cry over Shambhu’s and other farmers suicides. Indian government says that it does occasionally provide debt relief to the farmers such as the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme enacted by the Finance Minister in 2008. But there are way too many shortcomings in the relief package, one of them being it provides no debt relief to the farmer who got his loan from the private moneylender.[9]

In 2008, UN Human rights Council called India’s attention to the suicides of Indian farmers as a Human Rights Issue.  This is how India responded:

“[Other countries] had referred to India’s phenomenal growth but rightly raised questions about whether this was an all inclusive growth and if the gulf between the rich and poor is not growing. This is one of the greatest concerns of India and every effort is made to ensure there is no disparity between the rich and the poor. Recently, in the budget presented by the Finance Minister,India decided to write off US$15 billion worth of farmers’ debt.  This is one of the largest schemes undertaken by any government to promote the welfare of its farmers.  However, this was not a one-time exercise.  India is committed to make sustained efforts and coordinated programmes.”

One can’t help but be startled by the numbers. But it doesn’t take much to put the numbers in perspective. In comparison to the US$15 billion farmers’ debt waiver once in 2008, the Indian government has written off a total of US$84 billion in corporate income taxes since 2005. [10]

Another thing we constantly hear from the government is its insistence on high-tech GM food, even though it has devastated too many farmers. The argument is that India can’t feed it’s own people through traditional means, that small farmers can’t feed the world, is almost saying that farmer suicides are collateral damage that a society must pay in order to modernize the way we farm. Yet, if we just scratch below the surface we would learn that the world currently produces enough to feed itself. According to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), “with record grain harvests in 2007, there is more than enough food in the world to feed everyone—at least 1.5 times current demand. In fact, over the last 20 years, food production has risen steadily at over 2.0% a year, while the rate of population growth has dropped to 1.14% a year. Population is not outstripping food supply.[11].  And so, who is producing all this food? Does it surprise you to know that most of it is produced by small farmers? Indeed a half-billion small-farm families grow 70 percent of the world’s food[12].  And after 30 years of side-by-side research, Rodale Institute has demonstrated that organic farming is better equipped to feed us than conventional farming while doing it sustainably[13]. This is corroborated by United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) research that shows, in developing countries, organic agriculture can outperform conventional and traditional systems in terms of yields, cost-effectiveness and diversity[14]. If we listen to our instincts, we would say we knew it all along. We never dreamed or asked that our food should be produced by using uber-scientific patented seeds that create poison in each cell, are thirsty for water, hungry for chemicals and destroy the fertility of the land. Instead, most of our food can and is produced through farmers saving and sharing seeds, using natural inputs, working with nature and building upon their great heritage and common knowledge of farming that has evolved over thousands of years. Yet, many of these farmers are so poor, that they are priced out of the market and can’t afford to eat the food they themselves produce. And to add insult to injury, many GM seed companies approach these very same farmers (and tribals) to learn about their native knowledge of seeds and then patent that knowledge by re-creating that DNA in the lab.[15] That’s a different topic, although as John Muir; the famous Environmentalist said, “Tug on anything at all and you’ll find it connected to everything else in the universe” .

So, now we know that when we are told that high tech food & farmer suicides are simply the price that a society pays for globalization, for having a richer middle class, for industrialization, for modernity, for survival, we know that those are buzz words created to put wool over our eyes, and GM oil in our mouths. By the way, did you know that one of the by-products of GM Cotton in Indiais cotton seed oil that Indians eat every day?  A significant portion of crushed Bt Cotton kernels are consumed either as edible oil or mixed with other oils for direct human consumption in India.[16] You didn’t know you were eating it? It wasn’t labeled, right?[17] And even if it was labeled, do you feel informed enough to make a decision? Did you ever hear of an independent health study done about the long term consequences of eating GM food? I didn’t either.

And while we are open to listening to some facts, let’s throw this in. About one-third of the food produced is wasted or lost every year[18]. Think about it: ONE-THIRD. Add to it the fact, that animal farms use nearly 40 percent of the world’s total grain production[19] Those food grains can be fed to people. So, next time you order more than you can possibly eat & waste it, or think that eating non-veg is the ultimate sign of luxury, know this: Someone somewhere is paying for it, dearly, and perhaps with their lives.

60 years after Lal Bahaadur Shastri gave India the slogan “Jai Jawaan, Jai Kisaan”, India has all but forgotten its farmers. They are being pushed to the brink of desperation, to the brink of their lands, to their very lives. And we are all complicit in this negligence, especially the clan I belong to – the artists and the media.

Don’t believe me? Just try to count how many movies have you watched in the last 15 years about farmers? Yes, there was Lagaan (but it was also about Cricket and the British and we couldn’t possibly miss such a potent combination) and then, the daring “Peepli Live”. And what else? Which other film even remotely referred to the problems suffered by the hands that feed us? And if it did, would we watch it? Or would we rather not be disturbed by the mundane & sad issues that plague some little farmer in some remote corner of India?

If you are still with me at the end of this post, I am grateful for your time. And I know you want to make a change. Learn the facts. Dig Deep. Go behind the chatter. Start right where you are. Make noise. Shout. On behalf of yourself and your loved ones. On behalf of people who have no more voice, whose voice has been silenced. Shout for Shambhu.

— Swati Srivastava is a film-maker who believes artists have a special responsibility towards the world and that films can be instruments of mass construction. She is currently making a film about farmer suicides. If you are interested in knowing more and/ or would like to invest/ provide funding for the film, please contact Swati.

References:

[1] Translation – “The soil of my country produces gold, produces diamonds and pearls, this soil of my land”  Courtesy – Film “Upkaar” by Manoj Kumar

[2] Courtesy —  Film “Do Bigha Zameen” by Bimal Roy

[3] Every Thirty Minutes – Farmer Suicides, Human rights, and the Agrarian Crisis of India – CHR & GJ New York School of Law http://www.chrgj.org/publications/docs/every30min.pdf

[4] Bt Cotton in Andhra Pradesh – A three Year Assessment by Abdul Qayum and Kiran Sakkharihttp://www.grain.org/system/old/research_files/BT_Cotton_-_A_three_year_report.pdf

[5] Courtesy – Film “Mother India” by Mehboob Khan

[6] Monanto vs. US Farmers – Center for Food Safety –http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/CFSMOnsantovsFarmerReport1.13.05.pdf

[7] Bt cotton and livestock: health impacts – Dr Sagari R Ramdas (paper) http://www.gmwatch.eu/latest-listing/1-news-items/11872-bt-cotton-and-livestock-health-impacts-dr-sagari-r-ramdas

[8] This is THE END http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHGDSgan1gU&feature=plcp

[9]  Every Thirty Minutes – Farmer Suicides, Human rights, and the Agrarian Crisis of India – CHR & GJ New York School of Law http://www.chrgj.org/publications/docs/every30min.pdf

[10] Every Thirty Minutes – Farmer Suicides, Human rights, and the Agrarian Crisis of India – CHR & GJ New York School of Law http://www.chrgj.org/publications/docs/every30min.pdf

[11] Eric Holt-Giménez and Loren Peabody, From Food Rebellions to Food Sovereignty: Urgent call to fix a broken food system

[12] Francis Moore Lappe – The Food Movement: Its Power and Possibilities

[13] Farming Systems Trial – Celebrating 30 years by Rodale Institute

[14] Organic Agriculture and its Benefits – UNCTAD http://archive.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=4281&lang=1

[15] India slams Monsanto with un-precedented Bio-Piracy charges http://naturalsociety.com/india-slams-monsanto-with-unprecedented-biopiracy-charges/

[16] Celebrating 10 years – Bt Cotton in India A multipurpose crop

[17] Although this may begin to change if / when India mandates labeling of GM ingredients in packaged foods.http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Government-makes-genetically-modified-tag-must-from-January/articleshow/13915130.cms

[18] FAO Report – Global Food Losses and Food Waste

[19] Vandana Shiva  – Stolen Harvest

There is no disparity..!

In 2008, India appeared before the U.N. Human Rights Council as part of the Universal Periodic Review process, an important human rights procedure in which States review one another’s human rights records. The Human Rights Council explicitly called India’s attention to the suicides of Indian farmers as a human rights issue.India responded to questions about poverty and human rights by stating the following:

[Other countries] had referred to India’s phenomenal growth but rightly raised questions about whether this was an all inclusive growth and if the gulf between the rich and poor is not growing. This is one of the greatest concerns of India and every effort is made to ensure there is no disparity between the rich and the poor. Recently, in the budget presented by the Finance Minister, India decided to write off US$15 billion worth of farmers’ debt. This is one of the largest schemes undertaken by any government to promote the welfare of its farmers. However, this was not a one-time exercise. India is committed to make sustained efforts and coordinated programmes.

Pay attention to the evident hollowness of the Indian government’s claim to be making efforts to ensure that “there is no disparity between the rich and the poor.” To cite one case in point, in comparison to the US$15 billion farmers’ debt waiver once in 2008, the Indian government has written off a total of US$84 billion in corporate income taxes since 2005.

–Source: Every 30 Minutes – Farmer suicides, Human rights and the Agrarian Crisis in India (Center for Human Rights & Global Justice, NYU School of Law)

This is THE END

It’s been almost 50 years since Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri gave India the slogan “Jai Jawaan, Jai Kisaan” (Hail to the Solider, Hail to the Farmer). The father of our nation, Mahatma Gandhi famously said that “the soul of India lives in its villages”. Yet, today, every 30 minutes a farmer commits suicide. It is estimated that more than a quarter million Indian farmers have committed suicide in the last 16 years—”the LARGEST wave of recorded suicides in HUMAN HISTORY”. Millons more whose ancestors tilled the land and fed our country are being pushed off the land and displaced, so that they end up as slum dwellers and squatters in metros uprooted, devoid of their livelihood and their dignity.

It’s true that we have come very far from the nation that “hailed the farmer”. Today, the hands that feed us are cheated, robbed, mutilated, crushed, and brought to the brink of destruction. To these farmers, death is the only way out. Yet after they die, their bodies are desecrated. The same corrupt system that exploits their simplicity and capitalizes on their miseries, dishonors them after death.

This video is an attempt to give you a glimpse of what happens after these farmers die. In the indignity of their death, may you find an understanding of the anguish of their lives.

And may we stop for a moment and ponder over this thought, “One can tell the morals of a culture by the way they treat their dead.” If such is true, then what does this video say about us as a culture?

To learn more, read:

Every Thirty Minutes- Farmers Suicides, Human Rights, And the Agrarian Crisis in India; a report by Center for Human Rights & Global Justice, NYU School of Law

INDIA: The Mockery of Post-Mortems: A Threat to the Criminal Justice System

अति या इति ?

“मेरे देश की धरती सोना उगले, उगले हीरे मोती, मेरे देश की धरती”. जब भी भारतीय किसान के बारे में बात छिड़ती हैं, तो मन में यही चित्र उभरता है: एक आदर्ष किसान, एक परिवार- पत्नी, माँ, बाप, एक लड़का, एक लड़की, कम से कम एक जोड़ा बैल जिसे प्यार से किसान बुलाता है – हीरा-मोती , या राम-श्याम, या फिर चंदू-नंदू और एक गाय जो की परिवार को दूध देती हैं. हम सोचते हैं की किसान का जीवन कड़ी मेहनत का ज़रूर है लेकिन वह उसे आनंदौललास से निभाता हैं. मिट्टी उसकी माँ हैं और ये काम उसके बाप दाद्दाओ से चला आ रहा हैं. अंत में उसे वरदान मिलता है और उसका दृढ संकल्प रंग लाता ही है. इसी अचल व्यक्तित्व के कारण ही तो प्रधान मत्री लाल बहदुत शास्त्री ने हमें नारा दिया – “जय जवान, जय किसान”. यही छवि हैं ना किसान की हमारे हृदय में ? हमारे देश को भोजन प्रदान करने वाला, देश की उन्नति में तुरंत सहभागी, हमारा भारतीय किसान.

तब फिर क्या कारण है की आज हर तीस मिनट में एक भारतीय किसान आत्म-हत्या करता हैं? क्या कारण है की जो कीटनाशक वह खेत में उपयोग करने के लिए खरीदता है, उसी को पी कर तड़प तड़प के मरता हैं? क्या कारण है की उसका परिवार उसके मरने के कुछ समय बाद ही भूमिहीन हो जाता हैं? क्या कारण हैं की अगर वह बैल रखता भी है, तो उन्हें कोई नाम नहीं देता? क्या कारण है की बच्चो के लिए दूध के नाम पर किसान की पत्नी पहले हंसती है फिर रोंती हैं?

क्या कारण है की इतनी चोट खाने के बाद जब किसान मृत्यु को गले लगाता हैं, तब भी उसका निरादर जारी रहता हैं? वही भ्रष्ट -प्रणाली जो की जीतें-जी उसकी सादगी का शोषण करती है और उसकी दुर्गति तक का लाभ उठाती है, उसकी मौत के बाद उसके शव का अपमान करती हैं.

किसान के मरने के बाद उसके साथ क्या होता है, इसकी एक झलक दिखाने का प्रयास है यह विडियो. मौत के बाद भी जिसे करूणा नहीं मिलती, जीवन रहते उसकी पीड़ा कैसी होगी, शायद आप अंदाजा लगा सके.

We The Voice

WE are “We The People”, “We The Voice”. We can reclaim our democracies, stand up for our rights, fight against the wrongs. It is true that too many of us are sometimes too weak, too oppressed, too young, too old, too tired, too busy. Yet, every time, one small voice says, “I shall not be silenced”, “I shall not give up”, “I shall not be assimilated”, “I shall make myself heard”, “I shall care for another”, it strengthens and invigorates the collective voice. Let’s promise that WE the citizens of ONE planet, shall strive for a fair, non-violent, sustainable world for us and for the generations to come.